COACHING THE 3-4-1-2 AND 4-2-3-1 PDF


This Pin was discovered by Kent Fossland. Discover (and save!) your own Pins on Pinterest. Read a free sample or buy Coaching the and by Massimo Lucchesi. You can read this book with Apple Books on your iPhone. First of all before knowing whether 4–2–3–1 formation is most efficient or not we The formation is widely used by football managers and coaches all over .. What is the difference between the formations , , and in.

Author: Kagat Zulkizshura
Country: Ecuador
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: History
Published (Last): 11 July 2005
Pages: 307
PDF File Size: 11.39 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.42 Mb
ISBN: 916-5-34310-503-5
Downloads: 77736
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Daisho

This formation has coxching very frequently used by managers all over the world in the modern game. To either side of the playmaker, there are two wider players whose job it is to create chances from the -34-1-2 as well as cutting in. This formation has been described as being “deeply flawed” [47] and “suicidal”. Valeriy Lobanovskiy is one of the most famous exponents of the formation, using it with Dynamo Kyivwinning three European trophies in the process.

This formation is used by more offensive-minded teams. It is a much narrower setup in comparison to the 4—3—3 and coaxhing usually dependent on the “1” to create chances. While it seems defensive to the eye, it is quite a flexible formation, as both the wide players and the full-backs join the attack.

Coaching the and Massimo Lucchesi.

Coaching the and – Massimo Lucchesi – Google Books

By the s, it was the standard formation in England and had spread all over the world. Following England’s elimination at the World Cup by a 4—2—3—1 Germany side, England national team coach Fabio Capello who was notably successful with the 4—4—2 at Milan in the s was criticised for playing an “increasingly outdated” 4—4—2 formation.


A variation of 4—4—2 with one of the strikers playing “in the hole”, or as a ” second striker “, slightly behind their partner. But as I said, they had the players that could fir to the positions mentioned and hence won!

How best 3-44-1-2 Manchester United to combat Barcelona? Under the management of Jock SteinCeltic won the —67 European Cup and reached the final of the —70 European Cup using this formation.

Formation (association football)

There are two central defensive midfielders just above the defence. This led to the introduction of a centre-back to stop the opposing centre-forward, and tried to balance defensive and offensive playing. Archived from the original on 21 April Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon.

This formation is widely used by Spanish, French and German sides. The 3—3—3—1 formation was used by Marcelo Bielsa ‘s Chile in the World Cup, with three centre-backs paired with two wing-backs and a holding player, although a variation is the practical hourglass, using three wide players, a narrow three, a wide three and a centre-forward.

It has been argued that Pep Guardiola ‘s Barcelona and Bayern Munich used a modern version of this formation. For example, the popular “4—5—1” formation has four defendersfive midfieldersand a single forward. A staggered 4—3—3 involving a defensive midfielder usually numbered four or six and two attacking midfielders numbered eight and ten was commonplace in Italy, Argentina, and Uruguay during the s and s.

Is the ideal formation for Barcelona this season? Amazon Second Chance Pass it on, trade it in, give it a second life.

Coaching the and – Google Books

Customer Reviews Excellent Book on Tactics. Would you like to tell us about a lower price? Key playmaker Isco works primarily from the left, and he shoulders plenty of responsibility in dragging his side up the field, He either takes it and runs or plays closely off a true target man in Julio Baptista.


The width in the team has to come from the full-backs pushing forward. What is the best way of playing ? Emphasises the triangulation, but especially in the surprise of attack. It was this formation which gave rise to the convention of shirt numbers increasing from the back and the right. The goal is to outnumber the other team in all parts of the field but to not completely wear out all the players on the team using it before the full ninety minutes are up.

Another example of the 4—1—3—2 in use was the England national team at the World Cupmanaged by Alf Ramsey. Overall, a great book. In that case you are getting extra benefit from midfieldbecause as per situation they could attack like 4 on front and defend the match like 6 on defence.

A variation of the 4—3—3 with a defensive midfielder, two central midfielders and a fluid front three. Cesare Prandelli used it for the Italy’s 1—1 draw with Spain in the group stage of Eurowith some commentators seeing Daniele De Rossi as a sweeper.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of a formation? Also includes schemes for countering specific formations. The defensive midfielder will often control the pace of the game. The fact that Dortmund and Malaga were matched together in the quarterfinal was enticing, as the opportunity to see ” who uses the formation best” was always going to make for exciting football analytically speaking.